Saturday, April 21, 2012

CROP INSURANCE #1 PRIORITY

(Southeast Farm Press) -- SoutheastFarmPress.com reports, "U.S. Secretary of Agriculture Tom Vilsack, leaders of the U.S. Agriculture Crop Insurers Association and the directors of all U.S. grain associations agree that the single most critical part of the upcoming farm bill has to be crop insurance."  According to the story, high grain prices "have brought with them highest in history input costs, and risk associated with planting such a capital-intensive crop demands some sort of safety net."  Steve Rutledge, a spokesperson for crop insurance companies, noted that "crop insurance represented only 8% of the farm bill spending" and "one-tenth of 1% of overall government outlays" in the 2008 farm law.


To read the rest of the article: CLICK HERE

Thursday, April 19, 2012

WE MADE IT


We finally made it to the  end of the 2012 tax season and due to our office changing software, I must say it has been a little more difficult than normal and all of the returns took a little longer than usual, but our team did a great job and our clients, as usual, gave us some grace.

I just want to take this time to say thanks to all of our readers for their questions during the season and our readership continues to grow each month and I look forward to my 41st tax season next year.

I will be traveling to New York City this weekend, speaking at the IBS show at the Jacob Jarvis Center and then meeting with some of our New York clients and some of our other distance clients that are in attendance.  My wife Maggie is going with me so there will be a little R&R between meetings. 

Tuesday, April 17, 2012

DEATH AND TAXES

Death and taxes aren’t only certain; they also seem to share a same deadline in the U.S., according to a study that points to the role of stress in fatal accidents.

According to Bloomberg.com: Deaths from traffic accidents around April 15, traditionally the last day to file individual income taxes in the U.S., rose 6 percent on average on each of the last 30 years of tax filing days compared with a day during the week prior and a week later, according to research published in the Journal of the American Medical Association.

Even allowing Americans to file their taxes electronically hasn’t negated the crash trend, lead researcher Donald Redelmeier said. The findings suggest stress, lack of sleep, alcohol use and less tolerance to other drivers on tax deadline day may contribute to an increase in deaths on the road, Redelmeier said.

“An increase of risk in this magnitude is about the same as what we observe on Super Bowl Sunday, a time notorious in the U.S. for drinking and driving,” said Redelmeier, a professor of medicine at the University of Toronto in Canada, in an April 6 telephone interview.

The research showed that there were 226 fatal crashes for each of the 30 tax days and 213 fatal accidents for each of the 60 control days.

Stressful Deadlines

“Our research suggests that stressful deadlines can contribute to driver error that can contribute to fatal crashes,” Redelmeier said. “People have, for a long time, speculated that psychological stress may contribute to real world crashes, but this is the first study to pin that down.”

The study, which appears as a research letter in the medical journal, looked at tax deadline data from the Internal Revenue Service and fatal traffic accident data from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration from 1980 to 2009. The researchers then used a database to identify crashes that led to deaths. For every tax day, they also identified a day one week before and one week after as a comparison.

Redelmeier said drivers who are stressed should remember to buckle their seat belts, obey the speed limit, avoid alcohol, minimize distractions and refrain from driving recklessly.

“Under normal circumstances, everyone nods their heads agreeable,” he said. “Under stressful circumstances, it’s when you tend to forget these pieces of advice.”

To read the article: CLICK HERE

Sunday, April 15, 2012

TAX FREEDOM DAY 2012

Saturday, April 14, 2012

OBAMA'S REVENUE SOUP


Wall Street Journal editorial, Obama's Revenue Soup: A History Lesson on Capital Gains Taxes:

In "Annie Hall," Woody Allen tells the joke of two women complaining about a restaurant. The first says the food here is awful and the second replies, yes, and they serve such small portions. Sounds like President Obama's proposal to raise the capital-gains tax: It will hurt the economy and it won't raise much new revenue.

Mr. Obama's plan would raise the capital-gains rate on January 1 to 20% on those who earn more than $200,000 ($250,000 for couples), plus a 3.8% investment surtax to finance ObamaCare. That 23.8% rate amounts to a nearly 60% increase from the 15% rate in effect since 2003. And that's without his new "Buffett rule," which would take the rate to 30% for many taxpayers.

This and other rate hikes aimed at higher-income earners are supposed to raise about $700 billion in tax revenues over the next decade. Fat chance. Ever since the famous 1978 bipartisan capital-gains tax cut sponsored by the late William Steiger of Wisconsin, the same pattern has repeated itself: raising the capital-gains rate reduces revenues, and lowering it leads to revenue increases.

The nearby chart shows the 35-year trend in capital-gains revenue and tax rates—through 2008, the last year data are available.
The data clearly show that the overall economy is the single biggest factor in capital-gains realizations and revenue. But the data also show that time and again revenue has multiplied despite a lower rate, and arguably because of it. ... Congress shouldn't be fooled by government forecasters who predict a revenue boom from a higher capital-gains rate. They have blown this call every time. ...

In our view the optimal capital-gains tax rate is one that leads to the most capital investment, jobs and wealth gains for American workers. That economically optimal rate is somewhere close to zero and would lead to more overall tax revenue as the economy grew faster. But if Congress wants a capital-gains tax, history suggests the revenue maximizing rate is closer to 15% than to 23.8%.

As John F. Kennedy put it in 1963 when he endorsed a cut in this tax: "The tax on capital gains directly affects investment decisions, the mobility and flow of risk capital" as well as "the ease or difficulty experienced by new ventures in obtaining capital, and thereby the strength and potential for growth in the economy."

Today's Democrats in Washington are no Jack Kennedys. As President Obama told Charlie Gibson of ABC News in 2008, whether or not a higher capital-gains tax raises more revenue is irrelevant to him. He wants a higher rate as a matter of "fairness." The soup may be lousy but he wants more of it.

IRS GETS HALF A BILLION TO IMPLEMENT OBAMA HEALTH LAW


Did you ever wonder why the IRS is getting involved in our health care?  It has to do with them monitoring all the businesses to determine that they are providing the required coverage.  If you have ever tried to call the IRS you should be afraid.  It is not unusual to be on hold for 30 minutes.  I have even been on hold and then the music goes away and a busy signal comes over the phone.  I call back only to find that they are now closed for the day.

Even though the Supreme Court is looking at Obamacare they still are going forward funding the IRS.  See the article that was in Market Watch:
CLICK HERE

Friday, April 13, 2012

2012 PRESIDENTIAL RACE

As you most likely know, on April 9, former Pennsylvania senator Rick Santorum suspended his campaign for the 2012 presidential race. This move effectively clears the way for former Massachusetts governor Mitt Romney to assume the Republican nomination.  This helps clear the way in determining your future tax situation Romney has made taxes a centerpiece of his campaign, and we expect to see even more attention focused on the issue as November draws near:

  • Romney would make the Bush tax cuts permanent.
  • He would cut top rates to 25% for both individuals and corporations.
  • He would eliminate tax on interest, dividends, and capital gains for taxpayers making under $200,000.
  • He would eliminate the estate tax entirely.
  • He would eliminate the Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT) as well as new taxes imposed by the 2010 health care reform legislation.

We realize that this year's Presidential race will have a major effect on your taxes. So we're committed to tracking both candidates' tax proposals, letting you know how they affect your wallet, and offering proactive suggestions to plan for tax law changes. We're not here to take sides. We just want you to know we've got your back.
We'll be following the race carefully through November and beyond. So, if you have questions, don't hesitate to contact us.